'Zapping' Untreated Water Gets Rid of More Waterborne Viruses, Says Study

'Zapping' Untreated Water Gets Rid of More Waterborne Viruses, Says Study

Transmission electron micrographs of a nonenveloped virus, MS2 bacteriophage, before electrocoagulation (left) and after (right). (Image courtesy of Texas A&M Engineering/Shankar Chellam and Anindito Sen.)

Interested in Disinfection?

Get Disinfection articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Disinfection + Get Alerts

Using sophisticated microscopy and computational analysis, Texas A&M University researchers have validated a water purification technology that uses electricity to remove and inactivate waterborne viruses. The water purification strategy could add another level of safety against pathogens that cause gastrointestinal ailments and other infections in humans.

“There is always a need for new techniques that are better, cheaper and more effective at safeguarding the public against disease-causing microorganisms,” says Shankar Chellam, an engineer at Texas A&M University. “The water purification technique investigated in this study is a promising strategy to kill even more viruses at the earliest stages of water purification.”

The U.S. National Science Foundation-funded researchers detailed their findings in the journal  Environmental Science & Technology.

“Electrocoagulation is a promising alternative to conventional chemical-based coagulation approaches,” says Christina Payne, a program director in NSF’s Directorate for Engineering. “Through its single-step pathogen coagulation and inactivation process, minimizing the need for chemical production and transportation, electrocoagulation may reduce the environmental impact and energy demands of wastewater treatment plants.”

Before water reaches homes, it undergoes multiple purification steps including coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection. Conventional coagulation methods use chemicals to trigger the clumping of particles and microbes in untreated water. These aggregates can then be removed when they settle as sediments. While effective, Chellam noted that the chemicals used for coagulation are very acidic, making their transport to treatment plants and their storage a challenge.

Instead of chemical-based coagulation, the researchers investigated whether a coagulation method that uses electricity is as effective at removing microbes from water. They used a surrogate of a nonenveloped virus, called MS2 bacteriophage. Their choice of microbes was motivated by the fact that MS2 bacteriophage shares structural similarities with many nonenveloped viruses that can persist in water after treatment and cause disease in humans.

“The traditional multistep process of water purification has been there to ensure that even if one step fails, the subsequent ones can bail you out — a multiple barrier approach, so to speak,” Chellam says. “What we are proposing with electrocoagulation is process intensification, where coagulation and disinfection are combined in a single step before subsequent purification stages, to ensure better protection against waterborne pathogens.”


Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.