Wastewater Effluent May Contain Antibiotic-Resistant DNA, Study Says

Wastewater Effluent May Contain Antibiotic-Resistant DNA, Study Says

Interested in Treatment?

Get Treatment articles, news and videos right in your inbox! Sign up now.

Treatment + Get Alerts

Wastewater treatment effluent has been found to contain trace amounts of antibiotic resistant DNA, according to recent research. These products are often reintroduced to the environment and water supply, potentially resulting in the spread of antibiotic resistance.

As such, researchers at the University of Southern California Viterbi School of Engineering are studying the development of these genes in wastewater treatment processes. Their findings, published in Environmental Science & Technology, indicate that even low concentrations of just a single type of antibiotic leads to resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics.

“We’re quickly getting to a scary place that's called a post-antibiotic world, where we can no longer fight infections with antibiotics anymore because microbes have adapted to be resilient against those antibiotics,” says Adam Smith, assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at USC and lead investigator of the study. “Unfortunately, engineered water treatment systems end up being sort of a hot-bed for antibiotic resistance.”

The majority of the antibiotics we consume are metabolized in our bodies. However, small amounts pass through us in our waste, which are then carried to wastewater treatment plants. While bacteria consumes the waste products at the treatment facilities, the bacteria encounters the antibiotics and expresses resistance genes that reduce effectiveness of these medicines. These resistance genes can then be passed on from parent to daughter cell and between neighbors through a process known as horizontal gene transfer.

As the bacteria eats, reproduces and grows, a biomass is formed and disposed of or used as fertilizer for agriculture and livestock feed crops.

In an even more dire scenario, small amounts of antibiotic resistant bacteria and free-floating DNA make it through the filtration membrane and exit as effluent. In Los Angeles, some of this is released into the L.A. River and Pacific Ocean, while the rest is recycled for irrigation, car washes, firefighting or to replenish groundwater supplies.

The team — also including Ali Zarei-Baygi, the study’s first-author and Ph.D. student at USC, Moustapha Harb, postdoctoral scholar at USC, Philip Wang, Ph.D. student at USC, and Lauren Stadler, assistant professor at Rice University — believes that the amount of antibiotic resistant organisms formed in treatment plants could be reduced by employing anaerobic processes rather than aerobic processes, and by using membrane filtration.

Accordingly, for their study, they used a small-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor and compared the resulting antibiotic resistance profiles in the biomass and effluent to each other and to the varying concentrations and types of antibiotics they introduced into the system.

They discovered two key findings: the resistance in the biomass and effluent are different and therefore one cannot be used to predict the other; and the correlations they found between the added antibiotic and the resistance genes weren't always clear cut. In fact, their results indicated multidrug resistance in which bacteria had genes allowing for resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics.

“The multidrug resistance does seem to be the most alarming impact of this,” Smith says. “Regardless of the influent antibiotics, whether it’s just one or really low concentrations, there’s likely a lot of multidrug resistance that's spreading.”

They believe this is due to the presence of gene elements called plasmids. One plasmid may carry resistance genes for several different types of antibiotics, resulting in positive correlations between one type of antibiotic and the resistance gene of another. This not only further complicates things, but can be dangerous. Because of their extremely small size — 1,000 times smaller than bacteria — free-floating plasmids can easily make it through the filtration system in a treatment process and exit the plant in its effluent, researchers say.

The team is now looking more closely at the composition of the effluent and plans on applying what they learned to other waste streams, such as animal waste, through a partnership with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


Comments on this site are submitted by users and are not endorsed by nor do they reflect the views or opinions of COLE Publishing, Inc. Comments are moderated before being posted.